Landlord nie ma prawa by wejsc do nieruchomosci, jesli tenant nie zgadza sie (poza sytuacja awaryjna). Tutaj akurat nie ma problemu, ze bedzie probowal, bo jest pies. Wiec jedyne co moze zrobic, to narzekac, nachodzic, itp.
http://www.propertyinvestmentproject.co.uk/blog/my-tenant-wont-allow-me-into-the-property-for-viewings/
"While Citizen’s Advice does mention that landlords can rely on terms set in the tenancy agreement to gain reasonable access for viewings, it’s important to acknowledge that “forceful entry” into the property without legal consent (e.g. by a Judge) is never permitted, which is what I believe the situation would effectively be if a landlord or agent enters a property without permission. On that basis, viewing clauses become tragically ineffective and pointless, because they still don’t actually give you any power to enter the premises without permission.
Ultimately, the tenants right to refuse access will take presidency over any clause impeding the tenants right to “quiet enjoyment”, unless there is a genuine emergency. Section 11 clarifies that if there is an emergency the landlord can enter without permission, which I’m assuming is something like a heavily leaking/burst water pipe or fire.
The biggest issue ALL landlords should fear when contemplating the notion of entering a property without consent from the tenant is the prospect of harassment charges for “forcing entry”. It’s very real. And scary. You definitely don’t want that allegation hanging over your sorry little peanut-head. I wouldn’t risk it. It’s also worth bearing in mind (in case you actually want to act on your mindless stupidity), Judges are generally in favour of the poor vulnerable tenants in these situations, so it’s practically financial suicide for landlords. Trespasser be warned."
"If the tenant does refuse access while there are ‘reasonable’ viewing clauses, yes, the tenant IS in breach of contract, but that’s about it. I believe that’s the only pointless advantage of viewing clauses. I say pointless because, the landlord can technically serve a Section 8 notice on the ground of breach of tenancy, but really, what’s the point? The tenancy is approaching an end, and the assumption is that the tenant is going to vacate. It would be fruitless and a total waste of time in every sense. You’re probably better off serving a section 21 anyways (if you haven’t done so already, that is)."