2008-03-05 14:42:44, bloby00 napisał(a):
Mnie to juz Ken wkurza.... wogole jest pijak i wyszlo kilka razy, ze pojechali sobie na "wycieczki" (delegacje) na koszt podatnika. Co chwile to wymysla nowe oplaty za wjazd do Londynu: Congestion Charge, Low Emmission Zone i jesli sie nie myle to za kilka miesiecy wszystkie samochody osobowe nie spelniajace norm (czy to w zaleznosci od wielkosci silnika) beda placily 25 funtow dziennej oplaty za CC. Zreszta ciezarowki (niespelniajace norm) musza zaplacic 200 funtow za dzien, za wjazd w obreb M25. Co najsmieszniejsze, ze niby samochody na gaz nie musza placic CC, ale tak nie do konca. Maja duzy balagan z ta sprawa i przyznaja discounty jak im sie podoba, poniewaz procedura oficjalna jest bardzo ciezka (jesli niefabryczny LPG)....

Monitoring w Londynie juz przekroczyl wszystkie normy rozsadku. Wszedzie cie obserwuja i co najgorsze, ze jak sluzy to dobrym czynnosciom to OK, ale jak np zdzieranie kasy za parking czy inne wykroczenia.... Oczywiscie rozumiem jak faktycznie ktos zlamal prawo, ale to juz tutaj jest paranoja i co chwila sie slyszy o co raz to nowych mandatach ktore nie powinny byc wydane....itp

2008-04-15 16:11:15, bloby00 napisał(a):

Wlasciwie to wyslalem dwa podobne maile. Jeden bezposrednio do konserwatystow a drugi na adres mailowy Borisa Beckera. Odpowiedz dostalem dzisiaj, ale jak na razie tylko ze strony BackBoris. Oto jej tresc:

"The Mayor of London has a duty to speak up on behalf of London councils about the government's failure to control illegal immigration. London currently does not receive anything like enough funding to cope, because the government systematically undercounts. Boris has expressed his own view that where people have been here a long time and have no prospect of being able
to be sent back then they should be regulated - ensuring they can pay into the London economy; as opposed to taking from it. The Mayor cannot control the government's immigration policy - but he must defend the interests of London taxpayers."

Jak widzimy, nie ma konkretnego odniesienia do "naszego" filmu, chociaz zapewnienie Borisa, ze jesli imigranci sa tu wystarczajaco dlugo i nie ciagna kasy z panstwa tylko do niego sie dokladaja, to jest wtedy ok. Chyba taki poglad jest calkiem fair.

2008-04-23 18:51:17, bloby00 napisał(a):

Odpowiedz z biura Borisa juz przedstawilem wczesniej. Za to dzisiaj dostalem maila od konserwatystow. Oto jego tresc:

"I am writing on behalf of David Cameron to thank you for your e-mail regarding immigration.

Many people are concerned about the numbers of people wishing to come to live in Britain and for politicians to ignore this would be a betrayal. We must ask why so many see this as the biggest problem facing Britain today and how we can start defusing the tensions.

As David explained in his speech on population growth, we do need to bring down the level of net immigration to a more sustainable level in order to build a stronger society. We need to recognise beneficial immigration, both in terms of the economic effects and the wider social and environmental effects, and ensure that it is properly controlled.

We must begin by developing a coherent population strategy. The first stage will be to ensure that those who are made eligible for admission will benefit the economy and that our population grows at a rate that is sustainable. The second stage will be to ensure that we are prepared for this level of growth. We need to consider whether our public services and infrastructure are able to cope with new arrivals at both national and local levels, the environmental impact of a rapidly rising population, and the potential effects on community cohesion.

As David made clear in his speech, we need an annual limit on non-EU economic migration, enforced by a new Border Police Force, transitional controls for new EU entrants, and changes to the rules on marriages across national boundaries. And we also need a programme of radical welfare reform, to help people move from a life on benefits to a life in work, reducing the demand for migrant labour.

In November 2006 we produced the paper, "Controlling Economic
Migration", outlining our thoughts on the best way to manage economic migration into Britain. Over the coming months, we will be publishing policy papers showing how a Conservative government will take action to deal with each aspect of Britain's demographic challenge. I have attached an article from the Daily Telegraph by Shadow Home Secretary David Davis which explains our approach in greater detail.

Thank you, once again, for taking the time and trouble to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Alice Sheffield "

Jak widac, glownym punktem odnoszacym sie do nas jest: "transitional controls for new EU entrants". Tyle tylko, czy "new" oznacza tych co weszli ostatnio (Bulgaria, Rumunia)? Moze wczesniejsze rozszerzenie (wlacznie z nami). Czy tez moze tych co dopiero wejda?

No i wlasciwie co mamy rozumiec przez slowo "transitional" (przejsciowy)? Przeciez Polacy juz maja okres przejsciowy bo wszyscy co chca pracowac legalnie (na zatrudnieniu) musza to zglosic do Home Office.

Jesli dobrze rozumiem, to z wypowiedzi Torysow i biura Borisa wynika, ze owszem chca wprowadzic nowe plany imigracyjne, ale my sie do tego nijak mamy. Tak wiec obawy niektorych, ze konserwatysci beda nas wyganiac z tego kraju sa calkowita bujda..... (chociaz gwarancji nigdy nie ma )