Może i nie każdego, ale jakąś procent pobierających na pewno... Też mamy kobietkę w pracy - 5 lat pobierała nielegalnie benefity. I w końcu sprawa się rypła... Proces w sądzie, wyrok, artykuł z pięknym zdjęciem z podanym imieniem, nazwiskiem, miejscem pracy i zamieszkania w gazecie...

[ Ostatnio edytowany przez: Mieszko 09-11-2010 19:10 ]

otorz w pierwszym rozliczeniu np za rok w ktorym otworzyl firme i jednoczesnie jeszcze pracowal, wykazuje w sa te dochody i odliczony podatek.
pisano juz o tym an tym forum.
coz jesli ktos ukrywa dochody, wystarczy,z e zechce im sie zrobic kontrole w domu, sprawdza co maja i czy ich stac an to , wylicza i juz. to jak rosyjskiej ruletce.

Ja tez pracuje z dziweczyna, ktora byla samotna matka przez ponad 5 lat.Prawie 16 tysiecy ma do oddania.Zlodziej czesto wpada, bo mysli, ze skoro nikt nie zorientowal sie juz 3 lata, to wszystko jest ok i dalej robi swoje.Tylko podejrzenie wystarczy, zeby ludzie ktorzy zajmuja sie tym zrobili ci taki przemial, ze odechce ci sie kradziezy.Wspolpracownikow tej dziewczyny pytano sie, czy wiedza jak dlugo zyje ona z kims pod jednym dachem, kazdego z osobna.To jest dopiero wstyd.

I poza tym, jak wiesz o tym, co ona robi to powinnas to zglosic, to twoj obowiazek, w koncu okrada rowniez ciebie.

Usunięte

Usunięte

Zorientuja sie.Dziewczyny, z ktora pracuje facet stracil prace i uzyl jej adresu, skoro tam mieszkal.Podal w Jobcentre ten adres, advisor zlozyl aplikacje o hb i ctb, co jest normalne i okazalo sie, ze ona od kilku lat pobiera zasilek na ta nieruchomosc,jako samotna matka, bez lokatorow.Po nitce do klebka-sprawa skonczyla sie w sadzie.
Karanie jest skuteczne-criminal records zamyka wiele drzwi jesli chodzi o prace.Zlodzieja nikt nie zatrudni, przynajmniej nie za porzadne pieniadze, legalnie.Niech zlapia jednego na dziesiecu okradajacych, to juz jest sukces.Wstyd jakiego naje sie taki zlodziej jest bezcenny.

Usunięte

HMRC, sad w takich sytuacjach moze zajac np.nieruchomosc, jesli dlug jest wysoki, bardzo wysoki, wstrzymac wyplate dalszych zasilkow, albo poprostu zamknac do pudla.

Prosze:info ze stronki Councilu.To jest dopiero wstyd.
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 at Huntingdon Magistrates Court cases heard included:

David Harwood (36) now of Carlton Villas, Southend on Sea. He was overpaid £854.91 in housing benefit, between May 2009 and August 2009, when he failed to report that he had vacated his former address of Chatteris Road, Warboys whilst continuing to receive benefits at that address. He pleaded guilty to one charge of benefit fraud and was given a 12 month conditional discharge and ordered to pay back the overpaid benefit.

Lisa Abelwhite (38) of Upwood Road, Bury. She was overpaid £4956.87 in housing benefit and council tax benefit between February 2007 and January 2009 when she failed to report that she was in part time work, and her income from other benefits had increased whilst she claimed benefit. She pleaded guilty to four charges of benefit fraud, and was given 140 hours unpaid work and ordered to pay council costs of £240. She had already made arrangements with the council to repay all the money that she had falsely claimed.

Rafal Delmaczynski (32) now of Carey Close, Ely. He was overpaid £975 in housing benefit between June 2009 and September 2009. Two charges were brought against him for failing to report that he had started work and that he had vacated his address in Thongsley, Huntingdon, whilst continuing to claim housing benefit for that address. He did not attend court and the case was proved in his absence. He received a £200 fine, was ordered to pay the council compensation of £975 and council costs of £240.

Lillian Freeman (33) and Mark Taylor (30) of Sapley Park, Huntingdon and Cowper Road, Huntingdon respectively. Between November 2008 and September 2009 the couple were overpaid £1645.82 in housing benefit and council tax benefit when it was found that they had failed to report, that whilst Taylor lived with Freeman at Sapley Park, he was in full time work. Freeman pleaded guilty and her case was adjourned to 14 July 2010 for pre-sentence reports as she had previous convictions for benefit fraud. Taylor pleaded not guilty and his case was adjourned to 14 July 2010 for a pre-trial hearing.

On Monday 28 June 2010 at Huntingdon Magistrates Court cases heard included:

Julie Manning (46) of Marriotts Close, Ramsey. Manning was overpaid £6,995.62 housing benefit and council tax benefit between May 2007 and November 2008. She had pleaded guilty, on 23 June 2010 to two charges of failing to report that her partner lived at her address whilst she claimed housing benefit as a lone parent, and the case was adjourned for pre-sentence reports to 28 June 2010. She received a 24 month conditional discharge and was ordered to pay the council’s costs of £240. She has already made arrangements with the council to repay all the money she falsely claimed.

http://www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk/News%20and%20Communications/News%20releases/2010/July/Pages/BenefitFraudCasesHeardInCourt.aspx

Jak juz ktos zdecydowal sie ostatecznie kombinowac mniej legalnie lub nielegalnie nie powinien uzewnetrzniac swojego faktycznego stanu posiadania.Znam kolesia,ktory od 4 lat pracuje na part-time 18 h/week.Poza tym pracuje na czarno tezx 4 lata